Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Security Council, and a new office beneath
to claim that the entire interagency process is
broken.27 Had the Department of Defense
this official to coordinate ongoing interagency
activities. It recommends biannual guidance
listened to the Central Intelligence Agency
from the president to organize these affairs,
and State Department, it would have pre-
and a Quadrennial National Security Review
pared ORHA, CPA, and CENTCOM for cer-
to guide the national security bureaucracy just
tain contingencies and avoided those errors.
as the Quadrennial Defense Review supposed-
Had the National Security Council done its
ly guides the Pentagon.32
job, coordination would have been forced on
the agencies.
These proposals are offered as responses to
To many analysts, the lessons of these fail-
failures in Iraq. They are needed, their advo-
ures are clear: improve the American nation-
cates say, to improve our performance in the
al security bureaucracy's ability to plan, and
war against terrorists, which will entail con-
restructure it to heighten coordination. In
tinued counterinsurgency and stability opera-
tions.33 Some of the suggestions are reason-
Washington, calls for fixing the interagency
process to manage stability operations are
able. However, they rely not only on faulty
practically chanted. Top military officers and
premises about Iraq, but also on undue faith
civilian officials, including former chairman
in planning and coordination.
To the extent that
of the Joint Chiefs Peter Pace and current sec-
planning failed,
retary of defense Robert Gates, endorse inter-
Why Better Planning and Coordination
agency reform.28 Think tanks have produced
Wouldn't Have Saved Iraq
it was because
The first problem with the logic that better
various papers in the last three years that pro-
of the Bush
planning would have saved Iraq is that the
pose changes to the national security bureau-
administration's
planning for the war was both plentiful and
cracy to structure the interaction of senior
reasonably prescient. The problem was the
national security officials in Washington,
expectations
willingness to use the plans. The story is well-
facilitate planning in the relevant organiza-
about the war and
documented by James Fallows' Blind into
tions, and ensure cooperation in the field.
Baghdad, Thomas Ricks' Fiasco, Rajiv Chandra-
The State Department has established the
what was needed
sekaran's Imperial Life in the Emerald City, and
Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction
to sell it.
Bob Woodward's Plan of Attack. To the extent
and Stabilization (S/CRS) and given it the
lead in future state-building missions.29
that planning failed, it was because of the Bush
administration's expectations about the war
The most prominent proposals come from
and what was needed to sell it. The administra-
the Center for Strategic and International
Studies' Beyond Goldwater-Nichols project.30 The
tion did not entertain plans for a prolonged
occupation, and it saw exercises that envi-
idea is that parochial behavior in federal agen-
sioned one as efforts to undermine the case for
cies and the military services is bad.
war. The right conclusion is not that the
Goldwater-Nichols, legislation that brought
United States national security establishment
joint planning and operations to the Penta-
needs better planning, but that it needs better
gon in 1986, should become the model for the
leaders. That problem is solved by elections,
rest of the national security bureaucracy.
not bureaucratic tinkering.
CSIS's report suggests establishing plan-
Preparation for the war began around
ning offices in the civilian agencies involved
Thanksgiving 2001, when President Bush
in stabilization operations. It calls for annual
asked Gen. Tommy Franks, CENTCOM, to
exercises in which officials practice coordina-
refresh the plan for the invasion of Iraq. Plans
tion and proposes a joint national security
for what came after the invasion were far less
career path, modeled on the military's, which
organized, with scarcely connected efforts
temporarily places civilians in other agen-
cies.31
within the National Security Council, the U.S.
Agency for International Development, State,
The report also calls for a deputy assistant
and various parts of the Department of
for interagency strategies on the National
6