Page 15
Is there any other reason to keep the Marines on
Okinawa? The Marines, not surprisingly, respond yes.
National animosities, territorial disputes, ethnic ten-
sions, and poverty still bedevil the region. Among the
potential dangers the Marine Corps points to are trade
imbalances, bank failures, and currency devaluations.
Stability could be at risk, with potential chaos in
Indonesia, enmity between India and Pakistan, and so on.
And air and naval power is not enough, argued one Marine
Corps officer, as "stability is often provided by simple
combat power in the region. You don't get much stability
with air or naval power. You can't occupy territory."62
So what? If one wanted to catalog conflicts in which
the United States should not intervene, and certainly not
with ground forces, the examples cited by the Marines
would be at the top of the list. What if the successor
regime to Indonesia's corrupt Suharto dictatorship totters?
Let it go. What if Filipino and Chinese ships exchange
shots over the Spratly Islands? Stay out of it. What if
Japan and South Korea engage in more bitter sparring over
the Tokdu, or Takeshima, Islands? Tell both countries to
grow up and settle their differences like mature democra-
cies. What if India and Pakistan move toward war over
Kashmir? Stay as far away from the conflict as possible.
There is no need for Washington to treat every problem in
the world as its own.
Grasping at Straws: Noncombat Missions
Next, the Marines point to new, non-war-fighting
tasks. They state, "Our missions span the operation con-
tinuum from disaster relief and humanitarian assistance
through non-combat evacuation and peacekeeping."63 Some of
those tasks are of dubious benefit--especially American
involvement in UN peacekeeping or nation building.64
Others may diminish the Marine Corps' ability to carry out
its most important task (humanitarian operations, for exam-
ple, tend to degrade war-fighting capabilities). Even
those tasks with value--rescuing American civilians from an
imploding country, for instance--do not warrant the cost,
to both the United States and Okinawa, of the existing
force and base structure.
The American presence on the island during the Cold
War could at least be defended as serving a serious end:
the defense of East Asia against a hegemonic totalitarian
threat. Being ready to help Japan in the event of another
Kobe-magnitude earthquake, which the Marines point to as
an example of a worthwhile noncombat mission, or to