Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Page 19
negotiating table altogether.  That result would lead to
more death and destruction, not less.47
The Specter of Uneven Justice
The prospect of the ICC also raises the nettlesome
problem of uneven justice.  For example, 22 Rwandans were
publicly executed on April 24, 1998, after being convicted
in local courts of crimes committed during the genocide
campaign orchestrated by the previous Rwandan government.
Of the 346 people who have been tried in Rwandan courts,
about a third have been sentenced to death and another third
to life in prison.  The rest have received lesser sentences.
Only 26 have been acquitted, and there are about 125,000
people still awaiting trial.48
The week following the 22 public executions, Jean
Kambanda, prime minister of Rwanda during the 100 days when
majority Hutus sought to exterminate the Tutsis, admitted
before the Rwanda tribunal that he was guilty of committing
a crime against humanity and five other genocide-related
charges.  Kambanda is the highest former government official
being held by the tribunal, which has captured 25 suspects
accused of playing major roles in connection with massacres
in which at least half a million Tutsis and their sympathiz-
ers were killed.  Under the Rwanda tribunal's rules, Kam-
banda cannot be tried in Rwandan courts for the same crimes
and therefore faces a maximum sentence of life in prison
because the tribunal does not apply the death penalty.  But
one tribunal prosecutor has speculated that Kambanda may
eventually get reduced prison time if he cooperates in other
cases.49  The fact that Kambanda may get a reduced sentence
while lesser perpetrators are publicly executed upsets many
Rwandans.  As Australian journalist Pamela Bone points out,
The people being tried under the Rwandan justice
system are mostly not the principals of the geno-
cide.  These are being tried in Arusha, Tanzania,
by the United Nations International Criminal Tri-
bunal for Rwanda.  The UN tribunal is yet to se-
cure a conviction.  And the UN is . . . opposed to
the death penalty.  This means that those who
planned and incited the genocide will, if convict-
ed, spend some years in European jails, while the
lesser criminals will be put to death.  This does
not seem like justice to most Rwandans.50