Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Page 21
the original policy ideals on which HUD was based no longer
look to it as their primary vehicle.  Since 1986, with the
passage of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, a generation
of community development corporations (CDCs) has used that
tax law to raise corporate capital to renovate inner-city
buildings and to build new housing complexes for lower-
income individuals.  The scale of that enterprise has been
significant.  The National Congress for Community Economic
Development estimates that there are some 2,000 CDCs operat-
ing in the United States and that in just the four-year
period from 1987 to 1991 such groups built or renovated
87,000 housing units.  They did so largely without direct
federal appropriations.  Projects undertaken by the groups
rely on the sale of tax credits to corporate donors and are
touted as public-private partnerships.  The sale of credits
and assistance with project financing often are arranged
through two national intermediary groups: the Local Initia-
tives Support Corporation, a Ford Foundation spin-off, and
the Enterprise Foundation.
There are reasons to be suspicious of the long-term
prognosis for the efforts of such groups.  Early analyses
have already found maintenance problems, for instance, in
relatively new developments.46  The Congressional Budget
Office also has been critical of the low-income housing tax
credit as a financing vehicle.47  The point is that even if
one believes in the Model Cities ideal or thinks that it is
a good idea to locate community residents who will oversee
the management of older apartment buildings or that such
plans can lead to economic development, a significant effort
toward those ends is now under way and has essentially
bypassed the central HUD bureaucracy.
Conclusion
There is grave reason to doubt the need for the Depart-
ment of Housing and Urban Development--not merely because it
is expensive, or because many of its programs have been
marred by scandal, or because much of the housing it has
supported has been poorly managed and is in poor repair.
Rather, there is reason to be skeptical about the need for
HUD because it has, from its inception, been based on sus-
pect premises:
· HUD Premise: Cities are and have been, since World
War II, in a state of crisis and decline.