Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Page 11
ic to government interventions have taken a jaundiced view
of central planning.  In his influential essay, "The Myth of
Community Development," Nicholas Lemann notes that community
development and urban renewal of poor neighborhoods have
proven ineffective because of the effects of suburban migra-
tion and that, although presidents since Truman have tried
to spur economic growth of inner-city neighborhoods, none
has succeeded.25
Planning through Metropolitanization
The original HUD portfolio also included the goal of
"metropolitanization"--that is, the encouragement of plan-
ning, and even the development of new governmental jurisdic-
tions, which would transcend old city boundaries.  That
impulse had two chief aspects.  One was redistributional.
If poor inner-city neighborhoods could be joined politically
with more affluent suburban neighborhoods, public goods,
whether in the form of public schools or recreational facil-
ities, would be more equally distributed.  As Weaver put it,
"Planning for area-wide development can help us achieve an
appropriate balance of viable functions in cities and sub-
urbs."26  But the goal of metropolitan planning had deeper
roots than that.  It also stemmed from a long-standing
belief that American cities, even while growing, were
sprawling in ways that would have deleterious long-term
consequences.  That view was captured by Carter McFarland, a
ranking HUD official who had served under six presidents by
the time he published his 1978 book The Federal Government
and Urban Problems.
As everyone knows, our urban areas have grown at a
staggering rate since World War I. . . . The
growth was inevitable.  The character of that
growth was not.  The shape, or lack of shape, of
suburbia, and its sheer size have produced some
unpleasant and ominous results.  One of these is
"strip development," consisting of streets with a
melange of automobile dealers, used car lots,
various quick food establishments, gasoline sta-
tions and other assorted commercial establish-
ments.  Most are embellished with glaring lights,
gaudy signs, and billboards, which many tolerate
but few admire.  Commerce is important to any
human settlement.  It provides jobs and essential
services.  But the form it too often takes unnec-