Page 39
physicians put out a lot of information "for free." In
fact, medical practice is steered by distribution of infor-
mation, whether word-of-mouth presentations at conferences
or technical journal articles, and it often results in "off-
label" uses of drugs and devices. A free market for infor-
mation about devices will spur these activities. Doctors
could build their careers independently from the device
manufacturers when they submit their clinical results to
peer-reviewed journals and professional meetings. A physi-
cian's career, academic standing, and fortune can be built
on documenting a new use for a device or on replicating
successful trials or on debunking effectiveness claims.
Consumers may never read the New England Journal of Medi-
cine, but their physicians do.
No "Race to the Bottom"
Competition in the private market creates powerful
incentives to reduce costs. One way to reduce costs is to
produce goods or services of a lower quality. Called "race
to the bottom" in other situations, this is often cited as a
reason for public rather than private provision of goods and
services. Would private competition in the market for
device certification produce a "race to the bottom"?
The executive officers of certification organizations
are keenly aware of the fact that competing to lower the
certification hurdles is destructive. If the standards are
too lax, the third-party listing becomes meaningless to
consumers, and therefore meaningless to manufacturers, who
would have no incentive to buy the certifier's services.
There will be no change in the incentives that standards-
writing companies face if they are allowed to certify medi-
cal devices.
Just as the market produces low-quality goods, it also
produces high-quality goods, and consumers' desires dictate
which products remain on the market. The market for stan-
dards and certification is no different. The market will
generate a range of appropriate standards, each providing
the consumer a specific amount and type of information.
Consumers will demand at least some high-quality standards
and some labs to perform high-quality testing. Furthermore,
the individual consumer need not know what the different
marks certify. The consumer's doctor will know because he
has much more incentive to know.
The empirical experience of the last century has borne
out these observations. As competing organizations have