Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Page 7
The market, relying on individual initiatives, gener-
ates new institutions to spread information through the
economy.  The other key accomplishment of the market is that
it induces and sustains such institutions without coercion,
with minimal resource cost, and with a maximum of personal
freedom.
Market-created institutions produce and disperse a vast
volume of information about safety and quality every day.
For example, Consumer Reports and the Washington Checklist
tell prospective shoppers about best buys; the American
National Standards Institute (ANSI) provides manufacturers
with standards for manufacturing and safety so the consumer
knows that "brand X FM tuner" will work with "brand Y ampli-
fier."  There is no compelling reason to believe that the
market would not induce that same information flow about the
safety and performance of medical devices.
There are reassuring working examples of market solu-
tions to the same types of issues addressed by the FDA.  The
best-known example is Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL),
which has been certifying product safety for more than 100
years--longer than the FDA has been in existence.
Like the FDA, UL is committed to public safety.  Both
organizations work to safeguard the public from dangerous
products.  Both are staffed by expert scientists and techni-
cians.  UL's actions, like the FDA's, affect millions of
consumers and involve products worth billions of dollars.
· Every day, the public buys and uses products that are
UL listed or FDA approved.
· We put on our FDA-approved cosmetics after drying our
hair with our UL-listed hair dryers.
· We pour FDA-approved vitamin-enhanced milk over the
breakfast cereal we cooked on UL-listed stove tops.
· Driving home from work, we take FDA-approved aspirin
while cooling off with UL-listed automotive air-condi-
tioners.
Only the number of products the market produces limits the
parallels.
But there are some significant differences.  The FDA is
a tax-funded public agency, given legal monopoly power over
market access and the dissemination of information.  Its