Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Page 5
fants to breathe.  The FDA's action cost the lives of
10 to several hundred infants.9
· FDA action in 1992 halted production of Physio-Con-
trol's cardiac defibrillators for more than two years,
before allowing production to resume.  A defibrillation
authority, Dr. Richard Cummins, estimates "that FDA's
shutdown of Physio-Control might have caused a thousand
deaths."10
· "Balloon implants used to plug life-threatening holes
in brain arteries were rejected by the FDA because the
developers did not properly document their benefits.
Some neurosurgeons call the balloons `the world's stan-
dard of care.'"11
· Annually, 40,000 men undergo surgery to correct
benign prostate swelling.  An American-designed safe,
painless, permanent alternative--a tiny implantable
wire coil--was still not available in the United States
six months after its introduction in Europe.12
· Despite the clearly demonstrated safety and accuracy
of the home HIV test, FDA delayed its marketing for
five years.  As a result, an estimated 10,000 people
were infected with HIV because people who would have
used the test to find out that they were carriers of
the virus could not do so.13
These numbers reflect only some of the fatalities,
pain, and suffering that can be laid at the FDA's door.
Quality of life suffers when the FDA refuses to allow drugs
and medical devices to be sold until its exhausting, Byzan-
tine approval procedures are completed.  Vice President Al
Gore's National Performance Review proudly predicted that by
1997 new devices would receive final approval and be market-
ed within one year.14  Even had that goal been reached, the
FDA would have delayed access to the market for one year,
twice the time allowed in the law.  In the case of thrombo-
lytic therapy, that would have meant that only 11,000 people
would have died.
Taxpayers also bear a large, direct burden because of
the FDA.  The FDA is a monumental, costly enterprise funded
almost entirely by tax dollars (one exception is the FDA
program that permits drug manufacturers to make payments to
the FDA that are used to hire and keep additional drug
review and approval personnel at the agency).  The FDA
budget has hovered just below $1 billion annually since
1994.15