<<  <  >  >>

Page 53

(Washington: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996); and

U.S. Department of Transportation and Environmental Protec-

tion Agency, Clean Air through Transportation.

76. U.S. Department of Transportation, Innovations in Public

Involvement for Transportation Planning (Washington: U.S.

Department of Transportation, 1994), p. B-1.

77. Ibid., p. F-1.

78. Ibid., p. J-1.

79. U.S. Department of Transportation, Review of the Trans-

portation Planning Process in the Minneapolis-St. Paul

Metropolitan Area (Cambridge, Mass.: U.S. Department of

Transportation, 1993), p. 3.

80. U.S. Department of Transportation, Enhanced Planning

Review of the Seattle Metropolitan Area (Cambridge, Mass.:

U.S. Department of Transportation, 1996), p. ix.

81. Quoted in Peter Fish, "2040: A Portland Odyssey," Sun-

set, November 1996, p. 16.

82. Quoted in Alan Ehrenhalt, "The Great Wall of Portland,"

Governing, May 1997, pp. 20­24.

83. Western Attitudes, "A Community Attitude Survey for

Metro," Lake Oswego, Oreg., 1993, p. 4.

84. U.S. Department of Transportation, Innovations in Public

Involvement for Transportation Planning, p. E-1.

85. Metro, 2040 Framework Update (Portland: Metro, 1995),

pp. 2­3.

86. Metro, Metro Measured, p. 7.

87. Metro, "South/North Study Community Outreach," Portland,

1996, p. 1.

88. Metro, Regional Transportation Plan (Portland: Metro,

July 1995), chaps. 5 and 7.

89. Metro, Regional Transportation Plan Update (Portland:

Metro, March 22, 1996), p. 1-20.

90. Metro, Region 2040 Recommended Alternative Technical