Cato Institute
Policy Analysis
<<  <  >  >>
Page 43
· Metro's "community outreach" plan for its light-rail
planning specifies that it will "identify citizens,
business and community leaders willing to speak and
make presentations."87  Metro has indeed identified and
arranges speaking engagements for more than 50 citizens
who favor light rail but none who oppose it.
Metro's land-use and transportation plans for Portland
will be a disaster for most of the area's residents.  The
plans will more than triple road congestion, make single-
family homes almost unaffordable, and raise taxes--and those
are only the intended consequences.  Unintended consequences
could include increased air pollution and crime and the
creation of a permanent underclass forced to live its lives
in rental housing because home ownership is too expensive.
Metro's Regional Transportation Plan includes a list of
570 "preferred network" projects with an estimated cost of
about $4.5 billion, and a list of 240 "financially con-
strained network" projects with an estimated cost of about
$1 billion.  Planners say that funding is ensured only for
the constrained list.88
The most glaring problem is that planners made no
attempt to evaluate the effects of the various transporta-
tion projects on land use, congestion, air pollution, or
other important aspects of life.  For example, the south-
north light-rail line proposed for the reauthorization of
ISTEA is projected to carry fewer than 1 percent of all
person-trips in the Portland area, at a cost of nearly $3
billion.  That amount, with the funds for the constrained
list, would allow Portland to cover the costs of its pre-
ferred list, the one that presumably would be most benefi-
cial to the city.
By what standard will planners judge the success of
their projects?  Portland's transportation plan says that
congestion in residential and commercial areas will "signal
positive urban development for these areas."89
Yet even with the proposed 120-mile rail system, plan-
ners predict that Portlanders will continue to drive the
vast majority of their local trips.  Automobiles currently
account for 92 percent of the metropolitan area's trips, and
the plan predicts that they will account for 87.8 percent of
trips by the year 2040 (Table 4).  Transit's share of trips
will increase from 2.8 percent to less than 6.4 percent, and
most of that increase will be in bus riders (the remaining
trips will be made on foot or by bicycle).90