Page 29
Rail's Track Record
Rail construction takes so long that few of the rail
lines authorized by the 1991 ISTEA have been completed, and
those that have been completed are too new to judge. Howev-
er, more than a dozen cities have built new rail lines in
the past two decades, and those lines provide a good measure
of rail's success in moving people efficiently and in reduc-
ing congestion and pollution.
Light rail was originally proposed as an inexpensive
alternative to highways. In 1973 the state of Oregon esti-
mated that Portland light-rail service could begin on 46
route-miles for less than $84 million, or about $2 million
per mile.57 Costs quickly escalated after federal funds
became available and cities committed themselves to rail.
Portland's first 15-mile light-rail line, originally pro-
jected to cost $135 million when construction began in 1979,
ended up costing $214 million, or $14 million per mile; a
17-mile line now under construction is costing $963 million,
or $56 million per mile. A proposed 29-mile line was origi-
nally estimated to cost $2.85 billion, or nearly $100 mil-
lion per mile.
Weekday ridership, which was projected to reach 42,500
after 5 years and 57,000 after 10 years, has stubbornly
remained less than half of projections, around 25,000 riders
per day. Moreover, most of the riders were formerly bus
riders, and at least a third of all riders drive to park-
and-ride stations, which means that they produce almost as
much cold-start pollution as they would if they drove all
the way to work.
Portland transit ridership actually declined between
1980, when light-rail construction began, and 1990, four
years after its completion. Since Portland was rapidly
growing during those years, that means that transit lost a
significant share of both the total transportation and the
commuter market to the automobile. That is particularly
disappointing because Portland's transit system increased
its share of the commuter market during the 1970s, when it
was exclusively a bus system.
Portland's experience is the rule rather than the
exception. Of all the rail systems built in the past two
decades, only two--in Washington, D.C., and San Diego--were
accompanied by significant increases in overall transit
ridership.