transportation projects in those regions.
A long-planned widening of Lee Highway
Failure of the referenda could result in alter-
(U.S. 29), for example, had been estimated to
cost $85 million.27 The project was dropped by
ations to Virginia's transportation funding
formulas, thus steering more dollars to areas
the Virginia Department of Transportation
of exploding growth. That would be to the
earlier this year. But the northern Virginia
detriment of rural areas."22 In other words,
sales tax referendum includes the project but
Clement said that if the referenda do not
earmarks only $25 million for the job.
pass, more state money will have to be devot-
Another example is $350 million debt to be
ed to northern Virginia and Hampton Roads.
issued for a Dulles corridor railroad line. That
But if the referenda do pass, more state
is only about one-tenth of the funds needed to
money can be spent in rural areas.
complete such a project. Once those projects
The problem was even recognized by the
are started, residents can expect the state to
Washington Post, which editorialized that "sup-
come back and demand further tax hikes.
porters of the [tax] increase emphasize that it
Overall, about 40 percent of funds to be
is not to be a bailout of the state; the legisla-
raised in northern Virginia would go to mass
tion authorizing the referenda prohibits
transit rather than highway improvements,
Virginia from cutting the amounts allocated
thus not reducing congestion directly, if at
A recent investiga-
to Northern Virginia for road construction.
all. For example, the Dulles Toll Road is not
tion by the Virginia
That may prove hard to police."23
generally congested now, but a new Dulles
Furthermore, there is no guarantee that
rail line could spur further development
state auditor found
the increased sales tax revenues will be fully
along the corridor and add to congestion,
that VDOT grossly
used for higher transportation spending, on
not reduce it. Money would also be devoted
mismanages its
net. Indeed, the state seems to be going in a
to new rail cars for the Metro and Virginia
reverse direction with the recent diversion of
Railway Express. Rather than burden north-
$3.3 billion budget.
half a percentage point of the current sales
ern Virginians with tax increases, users of
tax, which had been used to fund transporta-
those services should pay a greater share of
tion, to nontransportation purposes. In
their own transportation costs.
2002, $317 million will be diverted.24 The
Another concern is the pro-tax political
funds are to be replaced with further
effect that would result from passing the
issuance of debt instruments called federal
sales tax increase referenda. Voter support for
reimbursement anticipation notes (FRANs),
reducing congestion may be mistaken as sup-
thus increasing burdens on future taxpayers.
port for higher tax levels. As a result, the leg-
islature may be more receptive to tax increase
7. Passage of the Referenda Would Spur
proposals in the future if the referenda are
Demand for More Tax Increases Later
supported. Besides, the general sales tax was
The state has a habit of understating the
hiked from 4.0 percent to 4.5 percent for
future costs of transportation projects to get as
transportation in 1986. Taxpayers were told
many started as possible, as noted by the state
then that the tax increase would solve traffic
auditor.25 After projects are well under way, the
congestion problems. But it turned out that
true costs become evident and the state
the tax increase simply fueled added growth
demands more cash from taxpayers. The feder-
in state spending.
al government plays a similar game with
8. VDOT Should Be Reformed before Its
national defense procurement. In Virginia, the
Budget Is Increased
proposed sales tax increase and related debt
issuance may create the demand for future tax
A recent investigation by the Virginia state
increases after underfunded long-term projects
auditor found that VDOT grossly misman-
ages its $3.3 billion budget.28 As the Washington
are begun. After all, Governor Warner is saying
Post summarized, the auditor "has drawn a
that the higher taxes will be just a "downpay-
ment on gridlock improvements."26
devastating portrait of poor management,
7