Cato Institute
<<  <  >  >>
The causes of our
a commercial bank subsidiary may now also
Introduction
own insurance, mutual fund, and investment-
financial troubles
bank subsidiaries. Far from contributing to the
were unusual
recent turmoil, the greater freedom allowed by
Mortgage foreclosure rates in the United
monetary policy
the act has clearly been a blessing in containing
States have risen to the highest level since the
it. Without it, JPMorgan Chase could not have
Great Depression. The nation's two largest
moves and novel
acquired Bear Stearns, nor could Bank of
financial institutions, the government-spon-
federal regulatory
America have acquired Merrill Lynch--acquisi-
sored mortgage purchasers and repackagers
tions that avoided losses to Bear's and Merrill's
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have gone into
interventions.
bondholders. Without it, Goldman Sachs and
bankruptcy-like "conservatorship." Several
Morgan Stanley could not have switched spe-
major investment banks, insurance companies,
cialties to become bank holding companies
and commercial banks heavily tied to real
when it became clear that they could no longer
estate lending have gone bankrupt outright or
survive as investment banks.
have been sold for cents on the dollar. Prices
and trading volumes in mortgage-backed secu-
rities have shrunk dramatically. Reluctance to
What Did Happen--
lend has spread to other markets. To prepare
and Why?
the ground for a return to normalcy in
American credit markets we must understand
The actual causes of our financial troubles
the character of the problems we currently face
were unusual monetary policy moves and nov-
and how those problems arose.
el federal regulatory interventions. These poor-
ly chosen public policies distorted interest
What Didn't Happen
rates and asset prices, diverted loanable funds
into the wrong investments, and twisted nor-
Some commentators (and both presiden-
mally robust financial institutions into unsus-
tial candidates) have blamed the current
tainable positions.
financial mess on greed. But if an unusually
Let's review how the crisis has unfolded.
high number of airplanes were to crash this
Problems first surfaced in "exotic" or "flexible"
year, would it make sense to blame gravity?
home mortgage lending. Creative lenders and
No. Greed, like gravity, is a constant. It can't
originators had expanded the volume of
explain why the number of financial crashes
unconventional mortgages with high default
is higher than usual. There has been no
risks (reflected in nonprime ratings), which are
unusual epidemic of blackheartedness.
the housing market's equivalent of junk
Others have blamed deregulation or (in the
bonds. Unconventional mortgages helped to
words of one representative) "unregulated free-
feed a run-up in condo and house prices.
market lending run amok." Such an indict-
House prices peaked and turned downward.
ment is necessarily skimpy on the particulars,
Borrowers with inadequate income relative to
because there has actually been no recent dis-
their debts, many of whom had either counted
mantling of banking and financial regulations.
on being able to borrow against a higher house
Regulations were in fact intensified in the
value in the future in order to help them meet
1990s in ways that fed the development of the
their monthly mortgage payments, or on being
housing finance crisis, as discussed below. The
able to "flip" the property at a price that would
last move in the direction of financial deregula-
more than repay their mortgage, began to
tion was the bipartisan Financial Services
default. Default rates on nonprime mortgages
Modernization Act of 1999, also known as the
rose to unexpected highs. The high risk on the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, signed by President
mortgages came back to bite mortgage hold-
Clinton. That act opened the door for financial
ers, the financial institutions to whom the
firms to diversify: a holding company that owns
monthly payments were owed. Firms directly
2