Cato Institute
<<  <  >  >>
Some, including
Krugman, support the Obama plan because it
greatest trick that supporters of socialized
would lead to socialized medicine. Krugman
medicine ever played was to convince the
Paul Krugman,
American people we don't already have it.27
writes hopefully that the Obama plan (and oth-
support the
er major Democratic plans) "could evolve into
The reasonable definition suggested here
single-payer over time."33 "Single-payer" is short-
Obama plan
(socialized medicine exists to the extent that
government controls medical resources and
hand for a health care system, like Canada's,
because it would
socializes the costs) allows for gradations of
where the government pays all the bills. Even
lead to socialized
socialism and makes sense of the public's belief
health policy analysts consider single-payer a
form of socialized medicine.34
that Medicare and universal coverage constitute
medicine.
socialized medicine. Medicare gives government
Finally, Obama himself belies that absurdi-
enormous control over the medical resources
ty. He has repeatedly signaled his support for a
consumed by beneficiaries and nonbeneficiaries
single-payer health care system. In 2003,
alike.28 Universal coverage likewise requires
Obama stated, "I happen to be a proponent of
a single-payer, universal health care plan."35 At a
extensive government controls, as markets will
not provide health insurance to everyone.
town hall meeting in August 2008, Obama
Harvard health economist David Cutler writes,
responded to a question about the single-payer
"Universal coverage necessarily means a larger
concept, "If I were designing a system from
role for government than is the case now."29
scratch, I would probably go ahead with a sin-
gle-payer system." He then hinted that, once
implemented, his reform plan could take Krug-
Conclusion
man and like-minded supporters where they
ultimately want to go: "my attitude is let's build
up the system we got . . . [and] we may . . . over
This definition also suggests that Obama's
time . . . decide that there are other ways for us
health care plan, and indeed all attempts at uni-
to provide care more effectively."36
versal coverage, would socialize medicine even
further. Though no rigorous projections have
Unfortunately, such absurdities often pass
been done on the Obama plan, the Lewin
for impartial journalism and informed com-
Group estimates that a similar plan would
mentary at major media outlets and policy
enroll 40 million people in a new government
organizations, while one-sided events staged to
insurance program, which would be akin to
arrive at foregone conclusions often pass for
doubling the Medicare rolls. The Lewin Group
debate.
projects that plan would increase federal spend-
At the Urban Institute forum, Susan
ing by more than $140 billion per year,30 which
Dentzer, editor-in-chief of the journal Health
some observers consider a vast underestimate.31
Affairs, remarked, "The people who like social-
ized medicine don't call it that."37 Indeed they
Further, Obama's proposed National Health
Insurance Exchange would let government dic-
don't, but they really can't blame others for
tate who must purchase coverage, how much
doing so. There's more substance than smear to
coverage they must purchase, and the premi-
the charge.
ums for every insurance policy in the nation.
Reasonable people can disagree over
Notes
whether Obama's health plan would be good
or bad. But to suggest that it is not a step
1. Obama `08, "The Blueprint for Change: Barack
toward socialized medicine is absurd.
Obama's Plan for America," http://www.baracko
bama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf.
Public opinion belies that absurdity. The
Harvard/Harris poll reports that, of those
2. See Obama `08, "Barack Obama's Plan for a
who claim to know what socialized medicine
Healthy America: Lowering Health Care Costs and
is, 57 percent believe Obama supports it.32
Ensuring Affordable, High-Quality Health Care for
All," http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/Health
Obama's supporters belie that absurdity.
PlanFull.pdf.
Some, including New York Times columnist Paul
5