Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20001-5403

Phone (202) 842 0200
Fax (202) 842 3490
Contact Us
Support Cato

White Paper

June 11, 2002

A Manifesto for Economic Reform in Argentina

by Steve H. Hanke and Kurt Schuler

Steve H. Hanke is Professor of Applied Economics at The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and a Senior Fellow of the Cato Institute in Washington, D.C. Kurt Schuler is a senior economist at the Joint Economic Committee of the U.S. Congress. The views here are his personal views, not necessarily those of the committee.


Despite abundant evidence that the economic policies of the last several months have been highly destructive, the government has persisted with them. Argentina's economy and political system are being ground to dust. How the resulting social upheaval is resolved will determine the shape of Argentine society for a generation or more.

The basic question Argentina has been unable to resolve since the 1930s is what type of economy it should be. Should it be a business oligarchy? Mercantilist? Fascist? Socialist? Populist? These possibilities have been tried in Argentina and elsewhere and have failed. Our recommendations are based on the assumption that most Argentines will eventually conclude that they want a market economy. They may unfortunately have to suffer much more pain experimenting unsuccessfully with other systems before they reach that conclusion. Developing the social consensus in favor of a market economy is a hugely important task, but we will say no more about it because the area in which we have the most to contribute is describing what economic reforms are desirable once the consensus in favor of a market economy exists.

We describe the policy goals that we believe will provide the most economic good for Argentina. A number of intermediate steps may be necessary to reach the goals, but what those steps will be will depend heavily on the economic and political situation, which is changing fast. We have already offered diagnoses and detailed prescriptions based on the specific circumstances of late last year and earlier this year. For now, it is more worthwhile to think about what the long-term outcome should be and what course should be followed to reach that outcome. We limit our discussion to those items that we deem to be necessary for survival, stabilization and recovery. Our focus is, therefore, on the "big ticket" items because it is precisely during periods of upheaval that far-reaching changes become possible most quickly.

Overall goal

Sustained and widely diffused economic growth though the application of a market economy, the only system that has ever been successful in providing such growth.

Principles

  1. Respect for private property and for contracts. In the case of Argentina, this means restoring badly damaged confidence.
  2. Government limited to those tasks it can perform competently.
  3. A sound and trustworthy currency.
  4. A solid financial system.
  5. A simple tax system with low tax rates.
  6. A government budget that over the business cycle is balanced or in overall surplus.

Timetable

When the opportunity for economic reform arrives, probably not until some months from now, the most urgent task will probably be to re-establish a stable currency. That can be done almost immediately, by dollarization. Taxes and the budget will be next. The problems of the financial system will probably have been "solved" by inflation. It is likely that the financial system will have been reduced to a low base, as it was in 1991, and therefore we do not expect the financial system to be as urgent a matter as the currency. However, should the opportunity for economic reform arrive in days instead of months, the problems of the financial system will be more pressing and may be as urgent as the currency problem.

Currency (for immediate action)

A bad currency hinders trade. Nobody wants or trusts the peso; everybody wants and trusts the dollar. Dollarization is the only monetary policy that makes sense. Note that dollarization would not prevent people from using other currencies if they wish; it will simply eliminate the peso and allow Argentines to use the dollar officially, which is what they have demonstrated they wish. We propose these steps:

Taxation and government accounting (for action immediately or in the short term)

The longer the current crisis lasts, the more likely it is that the government will be financing itself mostly with inflation. Economic stabilization will present an opportunity for increasing revenue while at the same time cutting tax rates and drastically simplifying the tax system. We propose the following steps:

Government spending (for action in the short term)

The government budget needs to be thoroughly re-examined. Here are some initial ideas:

Budget procedures (probably a longer-term project)

The financial system (a mixture of immediate and longer-term action)

We assume that economic reform will not occur for some months, and that when it does happen, the financial system will have been reduced to an extremely low level, as it was by 1991. The freeze of bank deposits (corralito) will have been resolved through inflation, bank failures, and government ownership of most of the banking system. Having been robbed of their savings three times in 20 years, Argentines will not trust onshore banks. Lending will only return slowly, because lenders will be afraid of a repeat of pesofication. We propose these steps:

Unemployment and labor law (a mixture of short- and longer-term action)

The long-term solution to unemployment is rapid economic growth. Even economies that have institutions hindering flexibility in their labor markets can reduce unemployment to low levels if they grow fast enough. For example, Ireland reduced its unemployment rate from 15.6 percent in 1993 to under 4 percent in 2001. Over that period, its real GDP growth was roughly 9 percent a year. With more flexibility in labor market institutions, unemployment can fall even faster.

Other (a mixture of short- and longer-term action)

Argentina, the IMF, and other international organizations

Our proposals do not depend on Argentina receiving loans from the IMF. The IMF's advice to Argentina in the last few years has been bad. Receiving the IMF's approval could be helpful for Argentina to gain access to other foreign credit. However, we recommend that Argentina not increase its current level of IMF borrowing: the risk is too great that as conditions for further loans, the IMF will require policies that are counterproductive. In the extreme case (which we hope can be avoided), Argentina should be prepared to default rather than accept IMF recommendations for new tax increases and other policies that will throttle the economy.

Presented to Dr. Carlos Menem, former President of Argentina, on June 11, 2002 at a meeting held at the Cato Institute, Washington, D.C.

Back to White Papers and Miscellaneous Reports

© 2009 The Cato Institute
Please send comments to webmaster