Cato on Facebook
Cato on Twitter
Cato on YouTube
Cato RSS1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20001-5403
Phone (202) 842 0200
Fax (202) 842 3490
Contact Us
FDA Actions Threaten Civil Liberties
by Jerry Taylor
Jerry Taylor is director of natural resource studies at the Cato Institute.
Added to cato.org on February 14, 1997
This article appeared in USA Today.
PRINT PAGE
CITE THIS
Share with your friends:
The Clinton administration's stampede to save our kids from Joe Camel runs roughshod over our most basic civil liberties, will do nothing to reduce teen-age smoking and threatens to actually ban cigarettes as we know them.
Although the Food and Drug Administration concedes that prohibited ads "do not rely on objective product claims," they must be controlled nonetheless because they "create the impression that smoking . . . is more prevalent and acceptable in society than it actually is." Yet the government cannot simply criminalize speech or imagery that takes issue with what it feels should be "acceptable in society."
Nor can the government, in the words of the U.S. Supreme Court, "reduce the adult population . . . to reading only what is fit for children." This is not Iran.
Jerry Taylor is director of natural resource studies at the Cato Institute.
More by Jerry TaylorNor is there a shred of evidence to suggest that advertising causes kids to smoke. Not the Canadian Supreme Court in 1995 the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in 1994, the U.S. Surgeon General in 1989, or anybody else has ever been able to unearth such evidence in their reviews of the published literature. Countries that have totally banned all tobacco advertising—like Norway—still have teen-age smoking rates higher than in the United States. Even the FDA's own focus groups identified "peer pressure; the desire to do something they perceived to be an adult activity; and a way to rebel against their parents"—not advertising—as the main reasons for underage smoking.
In order for the government to act, the FDA had to declare that cigarettes were really "medical devices" regulated by the 1938 Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. But once a product has been declared a "drug" or "device," it must, by law, be shown to be "safe and effective." And cigarettes cannot possibly meet that test.
As FDA Commissioner David Kessler wrote recently, "a strict application of these (FDA) provisions would mean, ultimately, removal from the market of tobacco products containing nicotine at levels that cause or satisfy addiction." Public interest lawsuits could force the strict application of those provisions regardless of the FDA's wishes. Prohibition of cigarettes as we know them would be the result.
All in a day's work for the paternal Clinton state. How long until they get to alcohol?
Share with your friends:
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
NEW ONLINE RESOURCE
Healthcare.Cato.org
Provides in-depth analysis of health care issues and reform initiatives with a wealth of resources on how individual choice and competition—not more government control—are the changes we need.
NEW BOOKS
The Beautiful Tree
An inspiring personal journey into the lives of families and teachers in the poorest communities of India, Africa, and China who have successfully created their own private schools in response to failed public education.
The Power Problem
Documents the enormous costs of America's military power, and proposes a new grand strategy that will advance U.S. national security by establishing a new set of rules governing the use of force abroad, and reaffirming the Founders' intention to restrain the president's ability to make war.
Climate of Extremes
An in-depth look at consistent, solid science on the other side of the gloom-and-doom global warming story that is rarely reported and pushed aside: that global warming is likely to be modest, and there is no apocalypse on the horizon.
SUBSCRIPTIONS
From audio recordings of the best of Cato's events to articles by world-class experts, CatoAudio, Regulation and Cato Journal offer an amazing range of quality news and analysis.