Cato on Facebook
Cato on Twitter
Cato on YouTube
Cato RSS1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20001-5403
Phone (202) 842 0200
Fax (202) 842 3490
Contact Us
'Soft Money' Aids Democracy
by John Samples
John Samples is director of the Cato Institute's Center for Representative Government.
Added to cato.org on October 3, 2000
This essay originally appeared in USA Today on Sept. 30, 2000.
PRINT PAGE
CITE THIS
Share with your friends:
Critics say "soft money" corrupts the political process. In fact, such contributions strengthen our democracy. We should be wary of restricting soft money.
The First Amendment protects our right to contribute to political campaigns, including giving soft money. Government only can ban contributions to prevent corruption. Advocates of a ban say soft money corrupts the process, but they lack concrete evidence. Without such proof, we shouldn't restrict a fundamental constitutional right. According to law professor Lillian BeVier, a ban would be "an unprecedented restriction on political activity . . . whose scope far exceeds what the First Amendment allows."
Even if the Constitution allowed a ban, soft money has other advantages. It goes to the political parties, not the candidates. By strengthening parties, soft money helps American democracy in three ways:
John Samples is director of the Cato Institute's Center for Representative Government.
More by John Samples- Parties unite individuals and groups behind a general program for the whole society. As political scientist Michael Munger says, "Parties are the antidote to narrow, particular interests." If we ban soft money, special interests will play a larger role in elections. Should we deny our nation an antidote to the poison of special-interest politics?
- The parties are a buffer against corruption. Parties solicit soft money and spend it supporting their candidates. The winners are beholden to the party and not individual donors. Soft money actually poses less danger of corruption than money given directly to a candidate's campaign. The Democratic Party can hardly corrupt Al Gore; the same goes for the Republicans and George W. Bush.
- The parties' use of soft money can increase electoral competition. America needs more competition: About 98% of congressional incumbents are re-elected. Soft money can help challengers compete with incumbents. Parties make sure soft money ends up where it's needed most. Right now control over the House of Representatives is up for grabs, and both parties are spending their soft money on races in which their candidates have a good chance of winning. Without soft money, many of those elections would have been uncontested.
Banning soft money would contravene the First Amendment, weaken political parties and lessen electoral competition. Banning soft money is a bad idea.
Share with your friends:
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
NEW ONLINE RESOURCE
Healthcare.Cato.org
Provides in-depth analysis of health care issues and reform initiatives with a wealth of resources on how individual choice and competition—not more government control—are the changes we need.
NEW BOOKS
The Beautiful Tree
An inspiring personal journey into the lives of families and teachers in the poorest communities of India, Africa, and China who have successfully created their own private schools in response to failed public education.
The Power Problem
Documents the enormous costs of America's military power, and proposes a new grand strategy that will advance U.S. national security by establishing a new set of rules governing the use of force abroad, and reaffirming the Founders' intention to restrain the president's ability to make war.
Climate of Extremes
An in-depth look at consistent, solid science on the other side of the gloom-and-doom global warming story that is rarely reported and pushed aside: that global warming is likely to be modest, and there is no apocalypse on the horizon.
SUBSCRIPTIONS
From audio recordings of the best of Cato's events to articles by world-class experts, CatoAudio, Regulation and Cato Journal offer an amazing range of quality news and analysis.