Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20001-5403

Phone (202) 842 0200
Fax (202) 842 3490
Contact Us
Support Cato
PRINT PAGE
  Sans Serif
  Serif

Share with your friends:

Restriction or Legalization? Measuring the Economic Benefits of Immigration Reform

CAPITOL HILL BRIEFING
Friday, August 14, 2009
Noon

Featuring Peter Dixon, Principal Researcher, Centre of Policy Studies, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University (Australia); and Daniel Griswold, Director, Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute.

B-339 Rayburn House Office Building

Get Flash to see this player.

Embed this video on your web site:

QuickTimeWatch the Event in QuickTime (M4V)
ipodDownload a Podcast of the Event (MP3)

As Congress prepares to tackle immigration reform, a new study from the Cato Institute estimates that the difference in the impact on U.S. households between the most and least restrictive policies would be about a quarter of a trillion dollars. Using a model of the U.S. economy developed for the Department of Homeland Security and other U.S. agencies, economists Peter Dixon and Maureen Rimmer conclude that increased restriction of illegal immigration would cost U.S. households $80 billion a year, while legalization through a temporary visa program would raise incomes by $180 billion. Professor Dixon will explain the findings and answer questions about the methodology of the study, and Cato scholar Daniel Griswold will share the results of his new study on immigration and the underclass.

Printer Friendly Version

The Cato Institute is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt educational foundation. Donations may be eligible for corporate matching gifts.
Contributions are received from individuals, foundations, corporations, and partnerships and are tax-deductible to the extent allowable by law.


Cato Institute • 1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. • Washington D.C. 20001-5403
Phone (202) 842-0200 • Fax (202) 842-3490