Let the Legislature Decide

by Ronald D. Rotunda

This essay originally appeared in USA Today on Nov. 21, 2000. Copyright 2000 Gannett Company Inc.

PRINT PAGE
E-MAIL PAGE
  TEXT SIZE

Not all disputes have to be resolved in court. In fact, both Florida and federal law provide a procedure for disputed presidential elections, and it doesn't involve the Florida Supreme Court.

Florida's non-judicial remedies include a prompt machine recount in races that remain tight after a first count. In this case, George W. Bush won them both. There is a hand count if there is machine malfunction, fraud or natural disaster. (There was none.)

Ronald D. Rotunda is a fellow at the Cato Institute and the author of Treatise on Constitutional Law.

More by Ronald D. Rotunda

Given the need to move fast, Florida law sets a deadline, which passed last week. If the secretary of State does not certify the Florida electors in time, federal law provides that the Legislature should decide how electors should be appointed. Florida statutes, in turn, say that the legislature will choose the electors directly. This issue came up in 1876 in a Rhode Island case. The state Supreme Court held that the Legislature picks electors, and the court does not have a role.

But when the justices of the Florida Supreme Court (appointed by Democratic governors) enjoined the secretary of State from certifying the election, they provoked a constitutional crisis by ignoring precedent, overturning their trial court and ignoring Democrat Bob Crawford of the state canvassing board, who agrees with the secretary.

The court order last Friday is also unusual because normally a court waits until an aggrieved party files a motion. Not this court. It gave Al Gore something he never requested -- an injunction preventing the secretary from following her statutory duties.

Some people claim that selection of Florida's electors by the state Legislature would be partisan, but no more partisan than courts changing election law after the fact and granting court orders nobody asked for.

In fact, a fight in the Florida Legislature might be better than a court decision. First, that's what state and federal laws provide. Second, the debate there would be public, unlike the deliberations of the state court. This debate would also include Republicans, while all of the justices who sit on the Florida court are Democratic appointees.

The issue here is not respect for the role of courts, but respect for the law when it says solutions to thorny political problems must be found elsewhere.

Get the Flash Player to see this player.

Daily Podcast
Malou Innocent - Fixing Relations in Pakistan
1234
OF SPECIAL NOTE

NEW BOOKS

Smart PowerSmart Power
Foreign policy expert Ted Galen Carpenter outlines strategies for protecting America’s security while avoiding unnecessary and unrewarding military adventures.

The Cult of the PresidencyThe Cult of the Presidency
“Rhetorical—and related—excesses are inherent in the modern presidency. This is so for reasons brilliantly explored in the year’s most pertinent and sobering public affairs book, The Cult of the Presidency: America’s Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power.”
––GEORGE F. WILL

The Dirty DozenThe Dirty Dozen
This unprecedented analysis of cases that changed the course of American history reveals the ongoing impact these cases have on free speech, economic liberty, property rights, private contracts, and much more.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

SUBSCRIPTIONSFrom audio recordings of the best of Cato's events to articles by world-class experts, CatoAudio, Regulation and Cato Journal offer an amazing range of quality news and analysis.

CATO STORE

CATO STOREFor Cato books and periodicals, hats and cups, specially created merchandise, and Cato-branded Lands' End clothing – the Cato Store is open 24/7.