So says the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Support dropped among independents too (not as much, but still more than the margin of error).
Latest Study
‘Paint Is Cheaper Than Rails’: Why Congress Should Abolish New Starts
Featured Event
June 11
Featuring Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ), Chairman of the Congressional Constitution Caucus; Neal McCluskey, Associate Director, Center for Educational Freedom, Cato Institute; and Lindsey Burke, Will Skillman Fellow in Education, Heritage Foundation; moderated by Laura Odato, Director of Government Affairs, Cato Institute.
Featured Publication
Latest Multimedia
Clint Bolick
June 18, 2013
June 18, 2013
Latest Commentary
Latest Blog Post
If there is anyone who should not be giving advice on Syria, it is President Clinton.
Featured Book
More Bang for Your Buck
The Cato Institute tops a new measure of think tank performance in the United States, according to a recent report. Cato bested all other U.S. think tanks in the main category of “Aggregate Profile per Dollar Spent.” “I’m grateful to the Center for Global Development for showing that Cato gives its sponsors something I wish government gave more of to taxpayers: bang for the buck,” said Cato CEO John Allison.
So says the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Support dropped among independents too (not as much, but still more than the margin of error).
In today’s Washington Post, columnist Bob Samuelson writes:
Then there’s the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), a body of 15 experts charged with limiting Medicare spending if it passes certain targets. But the law handcuffs IPAB. It can’t increase patient cost-sharing, restrict benefits, modify eligibility requirements or — in any one year — cut spending by more than 1.5 percent, reports the Kaiser Family Foundation.
All four of those assertions about supposed limitations on IPAB’s powers are false, as Diane Cohen and I explain here.

This work by Cato Institute is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.