American Big Brother: A Century of Political Surveillance and Repression

In his 2004 book Perilous Times, Geoffrey R. Stone observes that with respect to free speech rights in wartime, "Time and again, Americans have suppressed dissent, imprisoned and deported dissenters, and then—later—regretted their actions." In reality, as the timeline below demonstrates, it is not simply American's free speech rights that are often threatened by federal agencies. The federal government's penchant for surveilling, penetrating, and actively subverting domestic political activities by individuals and groups spans periods of peace and war over more than a century.

Whether protesting the march to war, federal policy on AIDS research, civil rights violations, or simply enjoying the Nevada desert at a "Burning Man" gathering, the common theme that emerges is that simply publicly expressing strong political views that run counter to the prevailing government political paradigm is often enough to trigger federal government surveillance. The purpose of this timeline is to further public understanding of the scope of this problem. Check this page periodically, as this "living document" is being updated regularly on the basis of ongoing archival research as well as fresh developments making news.

Share what you learned on Twitter with the hashtag #CenturyofSurveillance.

   
   

Multimedia

Cato's 2015 Annual Surveillance Conference featured a number of expert panels and presentations that illuminated the magnitude of and constitutional threats posed by the federal government's surveillance programs. The three segments below complement the themes raised by the timeline.

The Second Annual Cato Surveillance Conference: National Surveillance Laws on a Borderless Network

The Feeling of Being Watched

The Closing Keynote

Additional Readings

Blog Posts

Drones Are a Must For Trump’s Nativist Police State

For Trump  it seems like any policy, no matter how ineffective or damaging to our civil liberties, is worth trying as long as it seeks to reduce immigration. 

Feinstein-Burr: The Bill That Bans Your Browser

The probable upshot of the Feinstein-Burr proposal isn’t just that we all become less secure as big companies choose from a menu of terrible options that will enable them to comply with decryption orders, but also that smaller developers and open source projects look at the legal compliance burdens associated with incorporating encryption in their software and decide it isn’t worth the trouble.

The Police Don’t Need More Power to Target Muslims

The NYPD Demographics Unit was a constitutionally-dubious failure. It doesn’t deserve Ted Cruz’s praise.

“This Process Stinks”

New Speaker of the House, same ol’ budget process. 

Arab and Muslim Americans: The New “Others”

Proposals that would strip Arabs and Muslims of their rights and turn them into political and societal lepers should be repudiated–vocally and forcefully.

Commentary

Surveillance Reform: the Congressional-Intelligence Complex Strikes Back

The Nunes-Clapper letter is the first salvo in the battle over the fate of this critically important surveillance reform measure. It will not be the last.